Re: pg_receivewal documentation
Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-17T17:59:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v6_pgreceivewal-doc.patch (text/x-patch)
Hi, On 7/17/19 4:04 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> How about adding "or priority-based" after "quorum-based"? > > I would be fine with that for the first part. I am not sure of what a > good formulation would be for the second part of the sentence. Now it > only refers to quorum, but with priority sets that does not apply. > And I am not sure what "won't count towards the quorum" actually > means. Maybe something like the attached ? Although it doesn't help we need to include <literal>on</literal> as well... Best regards, Jesper
Commits
-
Doc: Clarify interactions of pg_receivexlog with remote_apply
- 4a25ed16400c 9.6.15 landed
-
Doc: Clarify interactions of pg_receivewal with remote_apply
- 1c423463e4b9 10.10 landed
- 059e22693b23 11.5 landed
- a15a40aaaedf 12.0 landed
- fd7d387e0548 13.0 landed