Re: partition -> partitioned
Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-06-19T09:02:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- use-partitioned-not-partition-v2.patch (text/plain) patch v2
On 2018/06/19 17:51, Amit Langote wrote: > On 2018/05/17 11:48, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2018/05/17 11:40, David Rowley wrote: >>> On 17 May 2018 at 13:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>>> Commit 499be013de6 used 'partition' where it really meant 'partitioned' in >>>> a few places including in a variable name. For example, what almost all >>>> places call 'partitioned_rels', make_partition_pruneinfo called >>>> 'partition_rels'. >>>> >>>> Attached a patch to make that uniform to avoid confusion. >>> >>> Looks good to me. >> >> Thanks for taking a look at it. > > Did this perhaps get forgotten? Noticed that the relevant code changed, so I rebased the patch. Also, made a minor update to a nearby comment. Thanks, Amit
Commits
-
Consistently use the term 'partitioned rel' in partprune comments
- 8f97af60d19a 11.0 landed
-
Support partition pruning at execution time
- 499be013de65 11.0 cited