Re: static assert cleanup
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-12-14T15:15:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 11.12.22 23:18, Peter Smith wrote: > +StaticAssertDecl(SysCacheSize == (int) lengthof(cacheinfo), > + "SysCacheSize does not match syscache.c's array"); > + > static CatCache *SysCache[SysCacheSize]; > > In almost every example I found of StaticAssertXXX, the lengthof(arr) > part came first in the condition. Since you are modifying this anyway, > should this one also be reversed for consistency? Makes sense. I have pushed this separately.
Commits
-
Static assertions cleanup
- 75f49221c222 16.0 landed
-
Rearrange some static assertions for consistency
- b18c2decd76e 16.0 landed