Re: backup manifests
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Try to avoid compiler warnings in optimized builds.
- 05021a2c0cd2 13.0 landed
-
Fix option related issues in pg_verifybackup.
- 0a89e93bfaa6 13.0 landed
-
Add index term for backup manifest in documentation.
- 4db819ba4039 13.0 landed
-
Code review for backup manifest.
- a2ac73e7be7a 13.0 landed
-
Document the backup manifest file format.
- 149f2ae88ab0 13.0 landed
-
Fix typo in pg_validatebackup documentation.
- c4f82a779d26 13.0 landed
-
Exclude backup_manifest file that existed in database, from BASE_BACKUP.
- 1ec50a81ec0a 13.0 landed
-
Msys2 tweaks for pg_validatebackup corruption test
- c3e4cbaab936 13.0 landed
-
Fix resource management bug with replication=database.
- 3e0d80fd8d3d 13.0 cited
-
Be more careful about time_t vs. pg_time_t in basebackup.c.
- db1531cae009 13.0 cited
-
pg_validatebackup: Fix 'make clean' to remove tmp_check.
- 9f8f881caa0f 13.0 landed
-
pg_validatebackup: Also use perl2host in TAP tests.
- 460314db08e8 13.0 landed
-
Generate backup manifests for base backups, and validate them.
- 0d8c9c1210c4 13.0 landed
-
Add checksum helper functions.
- c12e43a2e0d4 13.0 landed
-
pg_waldump: Add a --quiet option.
- ac44367efbef 13.0 landed
-
Catversion bump for b9b408c48724
- afb5465e0cfc 13.0 cited
-
pg_basebackup: Refactor code for reading COPY and tar data.
- 431ba7bebf13 13.0 landed
-
Use a ResourceOwner to track buffer pins in all cases.
- 3cb646264e8c 12.0 cited
-
Use ARMv8 CRC instructions where available.
- f044d71e331d 11.0 cited
-
Logical replication support for initial data copy
- 7c4f52409a8c 10.0 cited
-
Use Intel SSE 4.2 CRC instructions where available.
- 3dc2d62d0486 9.5.0 cited
-
Switch to CRC-32C in WAL and other places.
- 5028f22f6eb0 9.5.0 cited
-
Remove support for 64-bit CRC.
- 404bc51cde9d 9.5.0 cited
-
Change CRCs in WAL records from 64bit to 32bit for performance reasons.
- 21fda22ec46d 8.1.0 cited
On 12/31/19 10:43 AM, David Fetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 01:30:01PM +0100, Tels wrote: >> Moin, >> >> sorry for the very late reply. There was a discussion about the specific >> format of the backup manifests, and maybe that was already discussed and I >> just overlooked it: >> >> 1) Why invent your own format, and not just use a machine-readable format >> that already exists? It doesn't have to be full blown XML, or even JSON, >> something simple as YAML would already be better. That way not everyone has >> to write their own parser. Or maybe it is already YAML and just the >> different keywords where under discussion? > > YAML is extremely fragile and error-prone. It's also a superset of > JSON, so I don't understand what you mean by "as simple as." > > -1 from me on YAML -1 from me as well. YAML is easy to write but definitely non-trivial to read. > That said, I agree that there's no reason to come up with a bespoke > format and parser when JSON is already available in every PostgreSQL > installation. Imposing a structure atop that includes a version > number, as you suggest, seems pretty straightforward, and should be > done. +1. I continue to support a format that would be easily readable without writing a lot of code. -- -David david@pgmasters.net