Re: row filtering for logical replication
Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On 23/11/2018 03:02, Stephen Frost wrote: > Greetings, > > * Euler Taveira (euler@timbira.com.br) wrote: >> 2018-02-28 21:54 GMT-03:00 Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>: >>> Good idea. I haven't read this yet, but one thing to make sure you've >>> handled is limiting the clause to referencing only the current tuple and the >>> catalogs. user-catalog tables are OK, too, anything that is >>> RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding(). >>> >>> This means only immutable functions may be invoked, since a stable or >>> volatile function might attempt to access a table. And views must be >>> prohibited or recursively checked. (We have tree walkers that would help >>> with this). >>> >>> It might be worth looking at the current logic for CHECK expressions, since >>> the requirements are similar. In my opinion you could safely not bother with >>> allowing access to user catalog tables in the filter expressions and limit >>> them strictly to immutable functions and the tuple its self. >> >> IIRC implementation is similar to RLS expressions. I'll check all of >> these rules. > > Given the similarity to RLS and the nearby discussion about allowing > non-superusers to create subscriptions, and probably publications later, > I wonder if we shouldn't be somehow associating this with RLS policies > instead of having the publication filtering be entirely independent.. > I do see the appeal here, if you consider logical replication to be a streaming select it probably applies well. But given that this is happening inside output plugin which does not have full executor setup and has catalog-only snapshot I am not sure how feasible it is to try to merge these two things. As per my previous email it's possible that we'll have to be stricter about what we allow in expressions here. The other issue with merging this is that the use-case for filtering out the data in logical replication is not necessarily about security, but often about sending only relevant data. So it makes sense to have filter on publication without RLS enabled on table and if we'd force that, we'd limit usefulness of this feature. We definitely want to eventually create subscriptions as non-superuser but that has zero effect on this as everything here is happening on different server than where subscription lives (we already allow creation of publications with just CREATE privilege on database and ownership of the table). -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services