Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1

Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>

From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-28T13:39:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Nov 28, 2025, at 16:16, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Hackers,
> 
> While reviewing [1], it makes me recall an experience where I had a patch ready locally, but CommitFest CI failed with a shadows-variable warning. Now I understand that -Wall doesn't by default enable -Wshadows with some compilers like clang.
> 
> I did a clean build with manually enabling -Wshadow and surprisingly found there are a lot of such warnings in the current code base, roughly ~200 occurrences.
> 
> As there are too many, I plan to fix them all in 3-4 rounds. For round 1 patch, I'd see any objection, then decide if to proceed more rounds.
> 
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PsF8R0Bt4J3c92+T2F0mun0rRfK=-GH+iBv2s-O8ahJJw@mail.gmail.com
> 

CF entry added: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6262/

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/







Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix new-to-v19 -Wshadow warnings

  2. Reduce scope of for-loop-local variables to avoid shadowing

  3. Fix local-variable shadowing in pg_trgm's printSourceNFA().