Thread

  1. Re: Orphan page in _bt_split

    Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru> — 2025-09-22T16:44:18Z

    
    > On 18 Sep 2025, at 7:28 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
    > 
    > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:26:12AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
    >> Saying that, this patch sounds like a good idea, making these code
    >> paths a bit more reliable for VACUUM, without paying the cost of an
    >> allocation.  At least for HEAD, that's nice to have.  Peter, what do
    >> you think?
    > 
    > Hearing nothing, I'm planning to have a second look at it and do
    > something on HEAD.  Feel free if you have any comments.
    > —
    > Michael
    
    
    
    Attached please find rebased version of the patch with fixed mistypings.