Re: Python 3.1 support

James William Pye <lists@jwp.name>

From: James Pye <lists@jwp.name>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2009-11-19T20:12:34Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> But you wouldn't, for example, get away with breaking SQL (or even
> improving it incompatibly) to facilitate a better elog.

This doesn't fit the situation.

I'm not breaking PL/Python. I'm trying to add PL/Python3. =)

> I think of a PL/Python function as a Python script file stored
> in the database.

For Python, I think that's a mistake. Python scripts are independent applications.

[tho, I think this does illuminate our perspectives...]