Re: PARALLEL CTAS
Shane Borden <sborden76@gmail.com>
From: Shane Borden <sborden76@gmail.com>
To: Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-12-12T17:36:11Z
Lists: pgsql-sql
I saw this as an option. Let’s say you have a million row table. If you copy from STDIN, do you have to spool the source table to a local file first? Looking to replace a CTAS thats doing this all within SQL statements now. --- Thanks, Shane Borden sborden76@gmail.com > On Dec 12, 2022, at 12:25 PM, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/12/22 10:13, Shane Borden wrote: >> The issue is there are certain performance benefits to be had by doing parallel CTAS operations and when converting from Oracle to PostgreSQL switching to a “COPY” operation isn’t feasible. >> --- >> >> Thanks, >> > Today I suspect you're left with something like the following: > - CTAS from source where 1=2 (i.e. table definition via select semantics) > - copy from stdin (filled with intended CTAS select) > > >