Re: [SOLVED?] Re: Disk wait problem... not hardware...
Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-10-29T16:51:32Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On 10/29/23 11:45, pf@pfortin.com wrote: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:16:05 +0100 Peter J. Holzer wrote: > >> On 2023-10-29 09:21:46 -0400, pf@pfortin.com wrote: >>> These are all static tables. Does PG maintain a table row count so as to >>> avoid having to count each time? >> No. To count the rows in a table, Postgres has to actually read the >> whole table (or an index, if a suitable index (e.g. a primary key) >> exists). > Am I correct to assume count(fieldname) would only load that column for > counting? The OS reads (chunks of) blocks, not individual bytes, and Postgresql is record oriented, not column-oriented. > In other words: we should be specific (avoid "*") in general? No. -- Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.