Re: PostgreSQL 17 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Robert Haas
<robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>,
Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-04-08T15:28:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- allcommits.png (image/png)
On 4/8/24 11:05, Tom Lane wrote: > Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> writes: >> IMO the fact that people struggle to work on patches, and make them better, >> etc. is an immense blessing for the Postgres community. Is the peak of >> commits really a big problem provided we have 6 months before actual >> release? I doubt March patches tend to be worse than the November ones. > > Yes, it's a problem, and yes the average quality of last-minute > patches is visibly worse than that of patches committed in a less > hasty fashion. We have been through this every year for the last > couple decades, seems like, and we keep re-learning that lesson > the hard way. I'm just distressed at our utter failure to learn > from experience. I don't dispute that we could do better, and this is just a simplistic look based on "number of commits per day", but the attached does put it in perspective to some extent. -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com