Re: Fixes a trivial bug in dumped parse/query/plan trees
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-08-25T08:57:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On Aug 25, 2025, at 16:02, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > > > What about external parsers written for this format which might now break? > (Judging by the commitlog I believe this format is intentional and not a bug.) > > The commit message says: Let's adopt a format similar to that used for Lists, that is "<>" for a NULL pointer or "(item item item)" otherwise. Also retool the code to not have so many copies of the identical logic. It mentioned “(item item item)”, not a whitespace in front of the first item. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/