Re: 9.2RC1 wraps this Thursday ...
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-08-21T17:01:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> writes: > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane >> * pg_ctl crashes on Win32 when neither PGDATA nor -D specified >> I'm not sure that this qualifies as a release blocker either --- isn't >> it a plain-vanilla pre-existing bug? > This is to handle one part of the overall problem. Below is text from > previous mail discussion due to which new handling is introduced: > " >> I note that "postgres -C data_directory" will refuse to run on the >> command line because I've got admin privileges in Windows, and that >> pg_ctl normally starts postgres.exe using CreateRestrictedProcess. >> But it does not do so for the popen call in adjust_data_dir. Ah, okay, so that is a new bug in 9.2. I've adjusted the description on the open-items page to reflect what still needs to be fixed. >> isn't there a way to actually test if we're in a restricted process? > Do you mean to say that it should check if pg_ctl runs as an administrative > user then do the re-fork in restricted mode. Something like that. The proposed patch depends on there not being a conflicting environment variable, which seems rather fragile to me. Can't we test the same condition that postgres.exe itself would test? regards, tom lane