Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query
Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
From: Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-05-27T01:45:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > "Zeugswetter Andreas" <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at> writes: > > > I think we could get agreement to not allow implicit from entries > > > if there is a from clause in the statement, but allow them if a from clause > > > is missing altogether. The patch did not distinguish the two cases. > > > > Hmm, that's a thought. Taking it a little further, how about this: > > > > "Emit a notice [or error if you insist] when an implicit FROM item is > > added that refers to the same underlying table as any existing FROM > > item." > > > > 95% of the complaints I can remember seeing were from people who got > > confused by the behavior of "FROM table alias" combined with a reference > > like "table.column". Seems to me the above rule would catch this case > > without being obtrusive in the useful cases. Comments? > > Yes, I even added a define called FROM_WARN. It was disabled, and never > enabled. When can we enable it? How about a SET variable which allows PostgreSQL to reject any queries which are not entirely within the specificaton; kind of like -ansi -pedantic with gcc? Perhaps that's quite a bit of work, but it seems quite valuable for developing portable applications...Of course dependency on PostgreSQL extensions isn't a bad thing either ;-) Mike Mascari