Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
Tim Perdue <tperdue@valinux.com>
From: Tim Perdue <tperdue@valinux.com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 2000-07-05T04:08:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Further, I have had situations where postgres actually had DUPLICATE > > ids in a primary key field, probably due to some abort or other nasty > > situation in the middle of a commit. How did I recover from That? > > Well, I had to run a count(*) next to each ID and select out the rows > > where there was more than one of each "unique" id, then reinsert those > > rows and drop and rebuild the indexes and reset the sequences. > > Odd, were you using transactions here, or transactionless? Does it matter? I suppose it was my programming error that somehow I got duplicate primary keys in a table in the database where that should be totally impossible under any circumstance? Another stupid transactionless program I'm sure. At any rate, it appears that the main problem I had with postgres (the 8K tuple limit) is being fixed and I will mention that in my writeup. Tim -- Founder - PHPBuilder.com / Geocrawler.com Lead Developer - SourceForge VA Linux Systems 408-542-5723