Re: [HACKERS] rpms

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
To: "Sergio A. Kessler" <sak@tribctas.gba.gov.ar>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-03-01T16:33:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> >what is more clear/descriptive to you for a package that ONLY
> >contains PostgreSql libraries:
> >a)  postgresql-libs.xxx.rpm  (or maybe postgresql-clientlibs.xxx.rpm ?)
> >b)  postgresql.xxx.rpm
> suposse a newbie looking for a RDBM is told to install PostgreSql,
> what you think will be the first package he will try ?

Well, the newbie would be best off if he installed every package ;)

Anyway, afaik most RPM distros of a product have one .rpm file which
has the name of the package, and then may have other .rpm files which
have qualifiers, like "-server". So in choosing which .rpm file will
be the base package, it seemed most appropriate that it be the
client-side stuff, as opposed to docs, or server (which btw can't
really be run on its own without the client stuff installed
*somewhere*), or something else.

I appreciate your points, but it isn't clear to me how to eliminate
*all* possibilities for confusion via RPM package names, so chose to
use names which give some appropriate functionality for each package.

Regards.

                  - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart				lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California