Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>

View thread
From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org'" <pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-02-29T06:48:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
> > If not, I'd vote for pulling it out.  That's a heck of a poor word to
> > reserve.
> I am afraid of lots of user complaints, even if we had not already used
> TEMP.

OK, but we've already got "user complaints" about TEMP being a
reserved word, so that part seems to balance out. There is apparently
no basis in published standards for TEMP being a reserved word. And
btw it is not currently documented as a reserved word in
syntax.sgml...

                     - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart				lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California