Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Chris <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>
From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Cc: chris@bitmead.com, "pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-02-15T03:25:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Don Baccus wrote: > > At 10:30 AM 2/15/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote: > > >It's a logical fact that the existance of "offset", automatically > >implies > >ordering, no matter how many SQL textbooks you quote. > > Chris, that is your opinion and judging from the responses of other > folks on this list, it appears to be very much a minority opinion. > > Minority of one, as a matter of fact. There has been a parade > of posts disagreeing with your opinion. I've heard no-one say that offset is meaningful or in any sense useful in the absense of order. If it means something please enlighten us. If not, try reading before posting. > Why not give up and get on with your life before I get tired of > being polite? I'm *much* more stubborn than you are, particularly > when I'm right.