Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation

Tom Lane wrote:

> I have currently got it working (I think; not too well tested yet)
> using the proposal I offered before of "pay attention to the size
> of LIMIT, but ignore OFFSET", so that the same query plan will be
> derived from similar queries with different OFFSETs.  Does anyone
> have a substantial gripe with that compromise?

Would offset be any use if you did make use of it?