Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2002-08-05T16:25:37Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I don't have trouble with 128, but other than standards compliance,  I
> can't see many people getting >64 names.

One nice thing about 128 is you can basically forget about the weird
truncation behavior on generated sequence names for serial columns
--- "tablename_colname_seq" will be correct for essentially all
practical cases.  At 64 you might still need to think about it.

			regards, tom lane