Re: Significant performance issues with array_agg() + HashAggregate plans on Postgres 17

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Scott Carey <scott.carey@algonomy.com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2026-04-03T19:56:22Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> One idea would be to update parent contexts' memory totals recursively
> each time a subcontext allocates a new block. Block allocations are
> infrequent enough that may be acceptable.

> If we are worried about affecting unrelated cases, we could set an
> "accounting_enabled" flag for the contexts we care about, which would
> be automatically inherited by subcontexts, and then stop recursing up
> when that flag is false.

Yeah, I was speculating about similar ideas.  Since mem_allocated
is only changed after a malloc() or free() call, it probably
wouldn't add too much overhead to propagate that up to parent
contexts.  I agree with having a flag to prevent the propagation
from going up further than we actually care about, though.

Would it make sense to accumulate those values in a separate field
child_mem_allocated, rather than redefining what mem_allocated
means?

			regards, tom lane



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Disk-based Hash Aggregation.