Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-05-09T20:21:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 09 14:31:33 -0400 2011: >> I'm happy enough with that set of guidelines: namely, that we'd use >> src/extension only for things that don't require additional >> dependencies, and not for things that build standalone executables. >> If we're going to move things around, I think we should take the >> trouble to categorize them along the way, and your idea of inserting >> one more subdirectory under src/extension for grouping seems fine to >> me. > For executables we already have src/bin. Do we really need a separate > place for, say, pg_standby or pg_upgrade? Putting them in there implies we think they are of core-code quality. I'm definitely *not* ready to grant that status to pg_upgrade, for instance. regards, tom lane