Re: SQL JSON compliance
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-04-29T08:13:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 13.04.22 22:43, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Simon has just pointed out to me that as a result of recent commits, a > number of things now should move from the unsupported table to the > supported table in features.sgml. In particular, it looks to me like all > of these should move: This all looks correct to me. Please go ahead. > T811 Basic SQL/JSON constructor functions > T812 SQL/JSON: JSON_OBJECTAGG > T813 SQL/JSON: JSON_ARRAYAGG with ORDER BY > T814 Colon in JSON_OBJECT or JSON_OBJECTAGG > T821 Basic SQL/JSON query operators > T822 SQL/JSON: IS JSON WITH UNIQUE KEYS predicate > T823 SQL/JSON: PASSING clause > T824 JSON_TABLE: specific PLAN clause > T825 SQL/JSON: ON EMPTY and ON ERROR clauses > T826 General value expression in ON ERROR or ON EMPTY clauses > T827 JSON_TABLE: sibling NESTED COLUMNS clauses > T828 JSON_QUERY > T829 JSON_QUERY: array wrapper options > T830 Enforcing unique keys in SQL/JSON constructor functions > T838 JSON_TABLE: PLAN DEFAULT clause
Commits
-
Claim SQL standard compliance for SQL/JSON features
- a79153b7a285 15.0 landed