Re: update on TOAST status'

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-07-11T22:18:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck) writes:
>     I've  looked at textout() and, well, your style of detoasting
>     arguments looks alot better and easier.  From  the  way  it's
>     implemented  I  assume  the  per tuple memory context is done
>     too, no?

Not yet --- I'm running regress tests on it right now, though.
You're right that I'm assuming the function routines can leak
memory without trouble.

(We might need to avoid leaks in the comparison routines that are used
for indexes, but otherwise I think this scheme will work comfortably.)

			regards, tom lane