Re: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case
Stephen Birch <sbirch@ironmountainsystems.com>
From: Stephen Birch <sbirch@ironmountainsystems.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Date: 2000-01-10T07:24:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I still can't believe how fast you guys are, but would like to thank you. If I understood the vacuum logic, I would check your fixes, but it is still black magic to me!! I did try the new code against the full database and found no problems. As far as I can tell, you found it. Thanks again. Steve Tom Lane wrote: > "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > > The following patch seems to fix your case. > > However I'm not sure it's a right solution. > > That looks like nearly the same logic that I arrived at, although > what I committed included some additional code cleanups. As I said > in my prior message, I don't fully trust it yet --- but I am glad > you came to the same conclusion. > > regards, tom lane