Re: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case

Stephen Birch <sbirch@ironmountainsystems.com>

From: Stephen Birch <sbirch@ironmountainsystems.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Date: 2000-01-10T07:24:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I still can't believe how fast you guys are, but would like to thank
you.

If I understood the vacuum logic, I would check your fixes, but it is
still black magic to me!!  I did try the new code against the full
database and found no problems.  As far as I can tell, you found it.

Thanks again.

Steve


Tom Lane wrote:

> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > The following patch seems to fix your case.
> > However I'm not sure it's a right solution.
>
> That looks like nearly the same logic that I arrived at, although
> what I committed included some additional code cleanups.  As I said
> in my prior message, I don't fully trust it yet --- but I am glad
> you came to the same conclusion.
>
>                         regards, tom lane