Re: logical: fix recomputation required LSN on restart_lsn-only advancement
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-21T07:15:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On Apr 21, 2026, at 15:09, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote: > > Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > >> While reading logical replication code, I found an issue in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation(). >> >> In LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation(), updated_restart is tracked independently from updated_xmin, and the slot is marked dirty and saved when either one changed. But after that, ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN() is still only called inside "if (updated_xmin)”. >> >> So for the restart-only case: >> >> * updated_restart = true >> * updated_xmin = false >> * ReplicationSlotSave() runs >> * ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN() does not run because updated_xmin is false >> >> That means the global retention point managed by XLogSetReplicationSlotMinimumLSN() can stay stale until some later unrelated event recomputes it. Since ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN() derives the global minimum from slot restat_lsn, skipping it after a restart-only advance can retain excess WAL and may lead to WAL bloat. >> >> This patch fixes the problem by moving ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN() under “if (updated_restart)”. > > FYI, this overlaps with another post in the REPACK thread [1]. > >> Looks like this issue has been there for a long time, so if this analysis is correct, it may also be worth back-patching. > > As REPACK in PG 19 does not let xmin advance (that should be fixed in the > future), I think makes sense to apply [1] to v19. However, during logical > replication, xmin (IMO) gets updated rather often, so the problem should not > be that severe in earlier versions. > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/TYRPR01MB14195633567DA00ABD42570B794592%40TYRPR01MB14195.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com > > -- > Antonin Houska > Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com Thanks for pointing out that. I will review that patch. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/