Re: plperl and inline functions -- first draft

2009/11/17 Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:10:33PM +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote:
>> I noticed that there was a fairly large amount of bogus/inconsistent
>> whitespace
...
>
> Thanks -- I tend to forget whitespace :)
>
>> In the documentation you refer to this feature as "inline functions".
>> I think this might be mixing up the terminology
...
> I can accept that argument. The attached patch modifies the documentation, and
> fixes another inconsistency I found.
>

Cool.  I have no gripes with the revised patch.  I'm marking this as
ready for committer now.  Thanks!

Cheers,
BJ