Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
To: Jan Wieck <jwieck@debis.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>, jose@sferacarta.com, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-05-10T17:58:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > > NUMERIC without size is interpreted as NUMERIC(x,6). Why ?
> > > Standard SQL92 says that NUMERIC without size is equivalent
> > > to NUMERIC(1)
> PostgreSQL specific. Should I change it to standard?
The standard (per Date's book) is:
NUMERIC == NUMERIC(p), where p is implementation-defined.
NUMERIC(p) == NUMERIC(p,0)
Date also explicitly says that:
"The following are implementation-defined:
...
o The default precision for NUMERIC and DECIMAL if there is no
declared precision
..."
So where did NUMERIC(1) come from? afaict Jan should use what he feels
are reasonable values...
- Tom
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California