Re: why -Fdance archive format option works with ./pg_restore but not with ./pg_dump?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Srinath Reddy <srinath2133@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-01-24T15:24:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > I don't think we need a new file for this. pg_backup_utils.c is already > there for routines common to pg_restore and pg_dump. I'm not even on board with having a new function, because I doubt we should try to share this code in the first place. Who's to say that pg_dump and pg_restore must support exactly the same list of formats? For example, in the future we might decide that some format is obsolete and desupport it in pg_dump, while continuing to allow it for awhile in pg_restore for compatibility reasons. A closer-to-home possibility is that the work to allow non-text output from pg_dumpall will result in a format that pg_restore can read but pg_dump (by itself) doesn't write. So I'd just scrap pg_restore's parsing logic for this and replace it in-place. To the extent that that's copying and pasting stuff, fine. It's not like there's no other duplicativeness in their switch-parsing logic. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Tighten pg_restore's recognition of its -F (format) option values.
- 04ace176e08f 18.0 landed