Thread

  1. Re: Problems starting up postgres

    Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev@sectorbase.com> — 2001-09-06T17:05:52Z

    > > Sep  6 02:09:30 mx postgres[13468]: [9] FATAL 2:
    > > XLogFlush: request(1494286336, 786458) is not satisfied -- 
    > > flushed to (23, 2432317444) 
    
    First note that Denis could just restart with wal_debug = 1
    to see bad request, without code change. (We should ask ppl
    to set wal_debug ON in the case of any WAL problem...)
    Denis, could you provide us with debug output?
    
    > Yeek.  Looks like you have a page somewhere in the database
    > with a bogus LSN value (xlog pointer) ... and, most likely,
    > other corruption as well.
    
    We got error during checkpoint, when backend flushes pages
    changed by REDO (and *only those pages*). So, that page X (with
    bad LSN) was "recovered" from log. We didn't see CRC errors,
    so log is Ok, physically. We should know what is the X page
    (by setting breakpoint as suggested by Tom) and than look
    into debug output to see where we got bad LSN.
    Maybe it comes from restored pages or from checkpoint LSN,
    due to errors in XLogCtl initialization, but for sure it looks
    like bug in WAL code.
    
    > Vadim, what do you think of reducing this elog from STOP to a notice
    > on a permanent basis?  ISTM we saw cases during 7.1 beta where this
    
    And increase probability that ppl will just miss/ignore NOTICE
    and bug in WAL will continue to harm others?
    
    > STOP prevented people from recovering, so I'm thinking it does more
    
    And we fixed bug in WAL that time...
    
    > harm than good to overall system reliability.
    
    No reliability having bugs in WAL code, so I object. But I'd move
    check into XLogWrite code to STOP if flush request is beyond write
    point.
    
    Denis, please help us to fix this bug. Some GDB-ing probably will be
    required. If you have not enough time/disk resources but able to
    give us copy of data-dir, it would be great (I have RedHat 7.? and
    Solaris 2.6 hosts, Tom ?). In any case debug output is the first
    thing I'd like to see. If it's big please send it to Tom and me only.
    And of course you can contact with me in Russian -:)
    
    Vadim