Re: WAL replay logic (was Re: [PERFORM] Mount options f
Mikheev, Vadim <vmikheev@sectordata.com>
From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <VMIKHEEV@sectordata.com>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-02-18T19:15:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > > Added to TODO: > > > > > > * Allow WAL information to recover corrupted pg_controldata > > >... > > > > Using pg_control to get the checkpoint position > speeds up the > > > > recovery process, but to handle possible > corruption of pg_control, > > > > we should actually implement the reading of > existing log segments > > > > in reverse order -- newest to oldest -- in order > to find the last > > > > checkpoint. This has not been implemented, yet. > > > > So if you do this, do you still need to store that information in > > pg_control at all? Yes: to "speeds up the recovery process". Vadim _____________________________________________________ Sector Data, LLC, is not affiliated with Sector, Inc., or SIAC