Re: initdb - creating clusters
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
gazzatav@gmail.com, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-08-30T15:21:36Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > + The discussions in this chapter assume that you are working with > + an unmodified version of <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, > + for example one that you built from source according to the directions > + in the preceding chapters. If you are working with a pre-packaged > Rather than "unmodified", would it be better to say something more > like "without any extra supporting infrastructure"? So maybe "... you are working with plain <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> without any additional infrastructure, for example a copy that you built from source according to the directions in the preceding chapters." ? Do you have a feeling one way or the other about whether to repeat some of this text in each of the relevant sub-sections? I initially didn't want to do that, but thinking about how people consume the HTML docs, I'm afraid that anything not appearing on the same page won't get seen. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Doc: mention packager-supplied tools for server start/stop, initdb, etc.
- d2511d71328c 14.0 landed
- 214bc9038e39 13.0 landed