Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Colin 't Hart" <colinthart@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-21T15:49:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I think it would be useful to have a way of testing whether a cast to > a given type will succeed. The biggest problem with the > exception-catching method is not that it requires writing a function > (which, IMHO, is no big deal) but that exception handling is pretty > slow and inefficient. You end up doing things like... write a regexp > to see whether the data is in approximately the right format and then > if it is try the cast inside an exception block. Yuck. The problem here is that putting the exception handling in C doesn't make things any better: it's still slow and inefficient. And in the general case the only way to be sure that a string will be accepted by the input function is to try it. regards, tom lane