Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Colin 't Hart" <colinthart@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-09-21T15:49:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think it would be useful to have a way of testing whether a cast to
> a given type will succeed.  The biggest problem with the
> exception-catching method is not that it requires writing a function
> (which, IMHO, is no big deal) but that exception handling is pretty
> slow and inefficient.  You end up doing things like... write a regexp
> to see whether the data is in approximately the right format and then
> if it is try the cast inside an exception block.  Yuck.

The problem here is that putting the exception handling in C doesn't
make things any better: it's still slow and inefficient.  And in the
general case the only way to be sure that a string will be accepted by
the input function is to try it.

			regards, tom lane