Horton

Re: Isn't wait_for_catchup slightly broken?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-01-16T18:30:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 05:58:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Here's a version that makes sure that callers specify a write position not
>> an insert position.  I also simplified the callers wherever it turned
>> out that they could just use the default parameters.

> LGTM, and passes make check-world on my machine.

Pushed, thanks for reviewing.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Clean up TAP tests' usage of wait_for_catchup().