Re: patch: utf8_to_unicode (trivial)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-08-13T18:21:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> AFAICS the version in mbprint.c is flat out wrong, and the only reason >> nobody's noticed is that it should never get passed a more-than-4-byte >> sequence anyway. > Should we fix it, then, and if so how far should we go back? Yes, I'd vote for back-patching, at least to all versions in which the wchar.c version looks like that. regards, tom lane