Re: pg_stat_statements: more test coverage
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-12-31T15:58:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes: > It looks like the failing configurations are exactly all the big-endian > ones: s390x, sparc, powerpc. So it's possible that this is actually a > bug? But unless someone can reproduce this locally and debug it, we > should probably revert this for now. I see it failed on my animal mamba, so I should be able to reproduce it there. Will look. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Revert "pg_stat_statements: Add coverage for entry_dealloc()"
- 1141e29b61e9 17.0 landed
-
pg_stat_statements: Add TAP test for testing restarts
- 4710b67d4d35 17.0 landed
-
pg_stat_statements: Add coverage for entry_dealloc()
- 742f6b3e6df9 17.0 landed
-
pg_stat_statements: Add test coverage for pg_stat_statements_1_8()
- 3727b8d0e3f1 17.0 landed
-
pg_stat_statements: Add test coverage for pg_stat_statements_reset_1_7
- 3e527aeeedb0 17.0 landed