Re: pg_stat_statements: more test coverage

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-12-31T15:58:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> It looks like the failing configurations are exactly all the big-endian 
> ones: s390x, sparc, powerpc.  So it's possible that this is actually a 
> bug?  But unless someone can reproduce this locally and debug it, we 
> should probably revert this for now.

I see it failed on my animal mamba, so I should be able to reproduce
it there.  Will look.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Revert "pg_stat_statements: Add coverage for entry_dealloc()"

  2. pg_stat_statements: Add TAP test for testing restarts

  3. pg_stat_statements: Add coverage for entry_dealloc()

  4. pg_stat_statements: Add test coverage for pg_stat_statements_1_8()

  5. pg_stat_statements: Add test coverage for pg_stat_statements_reset_1_7