Horton

Re: Hooks for session start and end, take two

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>, "'Andres Freund'" <andres@anarazel.de>, "'Fujii Masao'" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, " 'Fabrízio de Royes Mello'" <fabriziomello@gmail.com>, "'legrand legrand'" <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>, "'Pgsql Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-12-20T14:23:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Dec-20, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> The patch has been committed once as of e788bd9, then reverted as of
>> 9555cc8 because it had a couple of fundamental issues and many people
>> were not happy with it.

> Hmm, should we mark the commitfest entry as rejected then?  Having it be
> marked committed seems pretty confusing.  The next version of the patch
> would have its own CF entry, I presume.

RWF seems appropriate.  We haven't rejected the concept altogether,
AFAICT.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Add hooks for session start and session end, take two