Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
I wrote: > And while I'm piling on, how is this bit in RelationCopyStorageUsingBuffer > not completely broken? [pile^2] Also, what is the rationale for locking the target buffer but not the source buffer? That seems pretty hard to justify from here, even granting the assumption that we don't expect any other processes to be interested in these buffers (which I don't grant, because checkpointer). regards, tom lane
Commits
-
When using the WAL-logged CREATE DATABASE strategy, bulk extend.
- 3e63e8462f31 16.0 landed
- 576bb0fc9342 15.0 landed
-
Avoid using a fake relcache entry to own an SmgrRelation.
- 1b94f8f232f6 15.0 landed
- 76733b399c49 16.0 landed
-
Fix data-corruption hazard in WAL-logged CREATE DATABASE.
- 692df425b688 16.0 landed
- 811203d4aff5 15.0 landed
-
initdb: When running CREATE DATABASE, use STRATEGY = WAL_COPY.
- ad43a413c4f7 15.0 landed
-
Simplify a needlessly-complicated regular expression.
- c6863b858291 15.0 landed
-
In 020_createdb.pl, change order of command-line arguments.
- 3d067c53b26d 15.0 landed
-
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE.
- 9c08aea6a309 15.0 landed
-
Fix replay of create database records on standby
- 49d9cfc68bf4 15.0 cited
-
Refactor code for reading and writing relation map files.
- 39f0c4bd670c 15.0 landed
-
Replace RelationOpenSmgr() with RelationGetSmgr().
- f10f0ae420ee 15.0 cited
-
Refactor the fsync queue for wider use.
- 3eb77eba5a51 12.0 cited