Re: [HACKERS] JOIN syntax. Examples?
Hannu Krosing <hannu@trust.ee>
From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@trust.ee>
To: "Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: "PGSQL HACKERS (E-mail)" <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 1998-12-14T19:10:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas G. Lockhart wrote: > > > The book "The Practical SQL Handbook", which is often recommended on > > these lists, uses the syntax `*=' and `=*' for left and right outer > > joins (page 211). I think we ought to support this syntax as well, > > since it will save new users from confusion. > > This one conflicts with Postgres' operator extensibility features, since > it would look just like a legal operator. so does = Could it be possible to extend the operator extensibility features to achieve the behaviour of outer/cross joins ? > The two books I have at hand (besides my old Ingres docs) are A Guide to > the SQL Standard by Date and Darwen and Understanding the New SQL by > Melton and Simon. Both focus on SQL standard syntax, and neither mention > the various outer join syntaxes accepted by Oracle, Informix, or Sybase. Has anybody tried out DB2 ? I have downloaded it (for linux) but have not yet tried it. > An explanation for the lack of standards compliance by the big three > probably involves the fact that they predate the standard by a > significant number of years. Not to mention that both =* and =(+) are more concise and easier to follow, at least for one with my headshape. The standard is probably the 'worst common denominator' or something like that :( ----------------- Hannu