Re: DOCS: Missing <structfield> tags for some SEQUENCE fields
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-13T09:22:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On Nov 13, 2025, at 13:17, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > While reviewing the recent patches for SEQUENCE documentation I found > [1] a few more instances where the <structfield> tag should have been > used for some of the sequence fields (per the recent push [2]). > > PSA patch v1 to address these. > > ====== > [1] Searched all docs for 'is_called' and for 'last_value' > [2] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/980a855c5c2e21e964a739694e24004f72e03fdf > > Kind Regards, > Peter Smith. > Fujitsu Australia > <v1-0001-Fix-more-structfield-tags.patch> Good catch. LGTM. I rendered the html pages and viewed them, the pages also look good. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
Commits
-
Doc: Use <structfield> markup for sequence fields.
- c677f2b09f24 19 (unreleased) landed
-
doc: adjust "Replication Slot" to mention physical & logical
- 8fa6b9030d68 19 (unreleased) cited
-
doc: consistently use "structname" and "structfield" markup
- 980a855c5c2e 19 (unreleased) cited