Re: DOCS: Missing <structfield> tags for some SEQUENCE fields

Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>

From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-13T09:22:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Nov 13, 2025, at 13:17, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> While reviewing the recent patches for SEQUENCE documentation I found
> [1] a few more instances where the <structfield> tag should have been
> used for some of the sequence fields (per the recent push [2]).
> 
> PSA patch v1 to address these.
> 
> ======
> [1] Searched all docs for 'is_called' and for 'last_value'
> [2] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/980a855c5c2e21e964a739694e24004f72e03fdf
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Peter Smith.
> Fujitsu Australia
> <v1-0001-Fix-more-structfield-tags.patch>

Good catch. LGTM. I rendered the html pages and viewed them, the pages also look good.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/







Commits

  1. Doc: Use <structfield> markup for sequence fields.

  2. doc: adjust "Replication Slot" to mention physical & logical

  3. doc: consistently use "structname" and "structfield" markup