Re: Timeline ID hexadecimal format

On 31/01/2023 10:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 30.01.23 17:05, Sébastien Lardière wrote:
>>
>> Here's the patch with the suggested format ; plus, I add some note in 
>> the documentation about recovery_target_timeline, because I don't get 
>> how strtoul(), with the special 0 base parameter can work without 0x 
>> prefix ; I suppose that nobody use it.
>>
>> I also change pg_controldata and the usage of this output by 
>> pg_upgrade. I let internal usages unchanded : content of backup 
>> manifest and content of history file.
>>
>> Should I open a commitfest entry, or is it too soon ?
>
> It is not too soon.  (The next commitfest is open for new patch 
> submissions as soon as the current one is "in progress", which closes 
> it for new patches.)


Done : https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4155/


-- 
Sébastien