Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
On 3/24/24 21:12, Melanie Plageman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 2:22 PM Tomas Vondra > <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >> On 3/24/24 18:38, Melanie Plageman wrote: >>> I haven't had a chance yet to reproduce the regressions you saw in the >>> streaming read user patch or to look closely at the performance results. >> >> So you tried to reproduce it and didn't hit the issue? Or didn't have >> time to look into that yet? FWIW with v7 it failed almost immediately >> (only a couple queries until hitting one triggering the issue), but v9 >> that's not the case (hundreds of queries without an error). > > I haven't started trying to reproduce it yet. > >> I however wonder what the plan with these patches is - do we still plan >> to get some of this into v17? It seems to me we're getting uncomfortably >> close to the end of the cycle, with a fairly incomplete idea of how it >> affects performance. >> >> Which is why I've been focusing more on the refactoring patches (up to >> 0015), to make sure those don't cause regressions if committed. And I >> think that's generally true. > > Thank you for testing the refactoring patches with this in mind! Out > of the refactoring patches, I think there is a subset of them that > have independent value without the streaming read user. I think it is > worth committing the first few patches because they remove a table AM > layering violation. IMHO, all of the patches up to "Make > table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async friendly" make the code nicer and > better. And, if folks like the patch "Remove > table_scan_bitmap_next_block()", then I think I could rebase that back > in on top of "Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async friendly". > This would mean table AMs would only have to implement one callback > (table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple()) which I also think is a net > improvement and simplification. > > The other refactoring patches may not be interesting without the > streaming read user. > I admit not reviewing the individual patches very closely yet, but this matches how I understood them - that at least some are likely an improvement on their own, not just as a refactoring preparing for the switch to streaming reads. We only have ~2 weeks left, so it's probably time to focus on getting at least those improvements committed. I see Heikki was paying way more attention to the patches than me, though ... BTW when you say "up to 'Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async friendly'" do you mean including that patch, or that this is the first patch that is not one of the independently useful patches. (I took a quick look at the first couple patches and I appreciate that you keep separate patches with small cosmetic changes to keep the actual patch smaller and easier to understand.) >> But for the main StreamingRead API the situation is very different. > > My intent for the bitmapheapscan streaming read user was to get it > into 17, but I'm not sure that looks likely. The main issues Thomas is > looking into right now are related to regressions for a fully cached > scan (noticeable with the pg_prewarm streaming read user). With all of > these fixed, I anticipate we will still see enough behavioral > differences with the bitmapheap scan streaming read user that it may > not be committable in time. Though, I have yet to work on reproducing > the regressions with the BHS streaming read user mostly because I was > focused on getting the refactoring ready and not as much because the > streaming read API is unstable. > I don't have a very good intuition regarding impact of the streaming API patch on performance. I haven't been following that thread very closely, but AFAICS there wasn't much discussion about that - perhaps it happened offlist, not sure. So who knows, really? Which is why I started looking at this patch instead - it seemed easier to benchmark with a somewhat realistic workload. But yeah, there certainly were significant behavior changes, and it's unlikely that whatever Thomas did in v8 made them go away. FWIW I certainly am *not* suggesting there must be no behavior changes, that's simply not possible. I'm not even suggesting no queries must get slower - given the dependence on storage, I think some regressions are pretty much inevitable. But it's still be good to know the regressions are reasonably rare exceptions rather than the common case, and that's not what I'm seeing ... regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Fix bitmapheapscan incorrect recheck of NULL tuples
- aea916fe555a 18.0 landed
-
Increase default maintenance_io_concurrency to 16
- cc6be07ebde2 18.0 landed
-
Separate TBM[Shared|Private]Iterator and TBMIterateResult
- 944e81bf99db 18.0 landed
-
Improve read_stream.c advice for dense streams.
- 7ea8cd15661e 18.0 landed
-
Increase default effective_io_concurrency to 16
- ff79b5b2aba0 18.0 landed
-
Delay extraction of TIDBitmap per page offsets
- bfe56cdf9a4e 18.0 landed
-
Add lossy indicator to TBMIterateResult
- b8778c4cd8bc 18.0 landed
-
Move BitmapTableScan per-scan setup into a helper
- a5358c14b2fe 18.0 landed
-
Add and use BitmapHeapScanDescData struct
- f7a8fc10ccb8 18.0 landed
-
Fix bitmap table scan crash on iterator release
- 754c610e13b8 18.0 landed
-
Bitmap Table Scans use unified TBMIterator
- 1a0da347a7ac 18.0 landed
-
Add common interface for TBMIterators
- 7f9d4187e7ba 18.0 landed
-
Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly
- de380a62b5da 18.0 landed
-
Move EXPLAIN counter increment to heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block
- 7bd7aa4d3067 18.0 landed
-
Refactor tidstore.c iterator buffering.
- f6bef362cac8 18.0 cited
-
BitmapHeapScan: Remove incorrect assert and reset field
- a3e6c6f92991 17.0 landed
-
Change BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator to accept BlockNumber
- 92641d8d651e 17.0 landed
-
BitmapHeapScan: Use correct recheck flag for skip_fetch
- 1fdb0ce9b109 17.0 landed
-
BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM
- 04e72ed617be 17.0 landed
-
BitmapHeapScan: postpone setting can_skip_fetch
- fe1431e39cdd 17.0 landed
-
BitmapHeapScan: begin scan after bitmap creation
- 1577081e9614 17.0 landed
-
Fix EXPLAIN Bitmap heap scan to count pages with no visible tuples
- f3e4581acdc8 12.19 landed
- 992189a3e94d 13.15 landed
- 262757b73286 14.12 landed
- d3d95f583995 15.7 landed
- 1f4eb734200a 16.3 landed
- 0960ae1967d0 17.0 landed
-
Remove redundant snapshot copying from parallel leader to workers
- 84c18acaf690 17.0 landed
-
Remove some obsolete smgrcloseall() calls.
- 6a8ffe812d19 17.0 cited
-
Remove the "snapshot too old" feature.
- f691f5b80a85 17.0 cited
-
Compute XID horizon for page level index vacuum on primary.
- 558a9165e081 12.0 cited