Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, there are some crashes of stress tests for v30 (for both single snapshot and multiple snapshot versions). > > --------------------- > > Looks like something is leaking, but not sure. > > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5577209672368128?logs=test_world#L277 (multiple snapshots) > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6439044873191424 (without multiple snapshots) As the test runs pgbench with --client=30 and the default value of max_worker_processes is 8, I'm not sure this is a leak. I've increased this parameter I couldn't see the error anymore. > This one showed something goes wrong, the sum of the table is broken. It may be 0 because non-MVCC safe, but I checked the logs: > > 2026-01-12 18:41:11.656 UTC client backend[76247] 007_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: SELECT (490588) / 0; I agree that this is due to the missing MVCC safety feature. I commented that check in the script for now. Besides that, I saw some deadlocks. I think this was due to the fact that multiple rows are updated per transaction, and that the keys are random, so it can happen that two transactions try to update the same rows in different order. I increased the number of rows in the test table to 10000 and don't see the deadlocks anymore. > backend[54349] 007_repack_concurrently.pl ERROR: could not create unique index "tbl_pkey_repacknew" > 2026-01-12 18:41:12.477 UTC client backend[54349] 007_repack_concurrently.pl DETAIL: Key (i)=(942) is duplicated. > 2026-01-12 18:41:12.477 UTC client backend[54349] 007_repack_concurrently.pl STATEMENT: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) tbl; This is tricky. I could reproduce the problem on my FreeBSD box a few times, never on Linux (no idea if the OS makes the difference since HW is also quite different, but CI also seemed to fail more often on FreeBSD.) Something seems to be wrong about UPDATE, but I'm failing to understand how it could relate to REPACK. This is an example of a duplicate value i=6118 SELECT i, j, xmin, xmax, ctid FROM tbl WHERE i=6118; i | j | xmin | xmax | ctid ------+--------+--------+--------+--------- 6118 | 445435 | 102317 | 103702 | (1,216) 6118 | 391135 | 103702 | 0 | (56,62) According to log, xid=102317 is the transaction used by REPACK and xid=103702 one of the test. pageinspect shows that the old version has not only HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED in t_infomask, but also HEAP_XMAX_INVALID. So far I could not reproduce the duplicities with the REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) command commented out in the test script, but that does not prove much (even with REPACK, not every run fails). Also I noticed that REPACK incorrectly sets cmin/cmax to 1 instead of 0 and it needs to be fixed, but I have no idea why this bug should cause exactly this weird behavior. I even added quite a few logging messages to reveal where in the code the HEAP_XMAX_INVALID flag is set for particular ctid, but after a failure I could not find the message for the problematic tuples. Ideas are appreciated. -- Antonin Houska Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow old WAL recycling during REPACK CONCURRENTLY
- 45b02984e2fa 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Advance restart_lsn more eagerly in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation
- 38470c2c1ea7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unnecessary signal handler change
- 5d48d3b14e0e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) error messages some more
- 378dffaf8c80 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revert "Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific"
- 01a80f062146 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) test out of stock regression tests
- 4b2aa4b39cba 19 (unreleased) landed
-
REPACK: do not require REPLICATION or LOGIN
- 5dbb63fc82b7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add missing initialization
- 05c401d5786a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify declaration of memcpy target
- 2cff363715ef 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Reserve replication slots specifically for REPACK
- e76d8c749c31 19 (unreleased) landed
-
doc: Add an example of REPACK (CONCURRENTLY)
- 8fb95a8ab6e5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific
- 0d3dba38c777 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Avoid different-size pointer-to-integer cast
- a3b069ef90bd 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix valgrind failure
- 5bcc3fbd196c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add CONCURRENTLY option to REPACK
- 28d534e2ae0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Rename cluster.c to repack.c (and corresponding .h)
- c0b53ec06309 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow index_create to suppress index_build progress reporting
- caec9d9fadf1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make index_concurrently_create_copy more general
- 33bf7318f94c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Document the 'command' column of pg_stat_progress_repack
- a630ac5c2016 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce the REPACK command
- ac58465e0618 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.
- 67c20979ce72 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Split vacuumdb to create vacuuming.c/h
- c4067383cb2c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove ReorderBufferTupleBuf structure.
- 08e6344fd642 17.0 cited
-
Revert changes to CONCURRENTLY that "sped up" Xmin advance
- 042b584c7f7d 14.4 cited
-
VACUUM: ignore indexing operations with CONCURRENTLY
- d9d076222f5b 14.0 cited