Re: Race conditions in 019_replslot_limit.pl

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, hlinnaka@iki.fi, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2022-02-17T03:15:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> So (a) it broke around 48 hours ago, which is already a useful
> bit of info, and (b) your animals seem far more susceptible than
> anyone else's.  Why do you suppose that is?

Eyeballing the commit log for potential causes in that time frame,
I can't help noticing

2 days ago	Andres Freund	Move replication slot release to before_shmem_exit().

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Revert 019_replslot_limit.pl related debugging aids.

  2. Don't fail for > 1 walsenders in 019_replslot_limit, add debug messages.

  3. Add retries for further investigation of 019_replslot_limit.pl failures.

  4. Add further debug info to help debug 019_replslot_limit.pl failures.

  5. Add temporary debug info to help debug 019_replslot_limit.pl failures.

  6. Move replication slot release to before_shmem_exit().

  7. Server-side fix for delayed NOTIFY and SIGTERM processing.