Re: [INTERFACES] MS Access & PsqlODBC: Invalid field name 'name'
Hannu Krosing <hannu@trust.ee>
From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@trust.ee>
To: Ewan Mellor <em@nexus.co.uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 1998-05-12T14:53:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Ewan Mellor wrote: > > I am using Byron's ODBC driver (version .0239 downloaded today) with > Access 7.00 under Win95 with Postgres 6.3. I am trying to link tables > into Access. Most tables work fine, but any field with the name 'name' > or 'sortname' or even 'garbagename' may not be used as part of an > index. This occurs whether the index is picked up automatically by the > driver, or if you are asked to choose a unique field by Access. Starting from v2.0 of Access the worn "name" became kind of reserved word in Access, as the table itself aquired an _attribute_ name, which contains the name of the table. so having a field called name is a problem in anyway (for Access). I have no idea why "sortname" or "garbagename" does not work. > Can this be fixed? As a workaround, could the driver optionally not > tell the client application about indices? In this way, I could tell > Access to ignore them and then (I think) I would be able to get at my > data. you can still do ALTER TABLE yourtable RENAME name TO not_name_any_more; ------------- Hannu