Thread

  1. Re: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON

    Goran Thyni <goran@bildbasen.se> — 1998-05-12T06:22:23Z

    Göran Thyni wrote:
    > 
    > Bruce Momjian wrote:
    > >
    > > Would people tell me what platforms do NOT support the MAP_ANON flag to
    > > the mmap() system call?  You should find it in the mmap() manual page.
    > >
    > > *BSD has it, but I am not sure of the others.  I am researching cache
    > > size issues and the use of mmap vs. SYSV shared memory.
    > 
    > SVR4 (at least older ones) does not support MMAP_ANON,
    > but the recommended in W. Richards Stevens'
    > "Advanced programming in the Unix environment" (aka the Bible part 2)
    > is to use /dev/zero.
    > 
    > This should be configurable with autoconf:
    > 
    > <PSEUDO CODE>
    > 
    > if (exists MAP_ANON) use it; else use /dev/zero
    > 
    > ------------
    > 
    > flags = MAP_SHARED;
    > #ifdef HAS_MMAP_ANON
    > fd = -1;
    > flags |= MAP_ANON;
    > #else
    > fd = open('/dev/zero, O_RDWR);
    > #endif
    > area = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, flags, fd, 0);
    > 
    > </PSEUDO CODE>
    
    Ouch, hate to say this but:
    I played around with this last night and
    I can't get either of the above technics to work with Linux 2.0.33
    
    I will try it with the upcoming 2.2,
    but for now, we can't loose shmem without loosing
    a large part of the users (including some developers).
    flags = MAP_SHARED;
    
    <PSEUDO CODE>
    #ifdef HAS_WORKING_MMAP
    #ifdef HAS_MMAP_ANON
    fd = -1;
    flags |= MAP_ANON;
    #else
    fd = open('/dev/zero, O_RDWR);
    #endif
    area = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, flags, fd, 0);
    #else
    id = shget(...);
    area = shmat(...);
    #endif
    </PSEUDO CODE>
    
    	not happy,
    -- 
    ---------------------------------------------
    Göran Thyni, sysadm, JMS Bildbasen, Kiruna