Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable

Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
To: Matthijs van der Vleuten <postgresql@zr40.nl>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-10-19T14:40:04Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Block ALTER INDEX/TABLE index_name ALTER COLUMN colname SET (options)

On 10/18/21, 11:49 PM, "Matthijs van der Vleuten" <postgresql@zr40.nl> wrote:
> The test case doesn't seem entirely correct to me? The index being
> dropped (btree_tall_tbl_idx2) doesn't exist.

This was fixed before it was committed [0].

> Also, I don't believe this tests the case of dropping the index when
> it previously has been altered in this way.

That can still fail with the "has no options" ERROR, and fixing it
will still require a manual catalog update.  The ERROR is actually
coming from the call to index_open(), so bypassing it might require
some rather intrusive changes.  Given that it took over a year for
this bug to be reported, I suspect it might be more trouble than it's
worth.

Nathan

[0] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=fdd8857