Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-02-08T04:37:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:28:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3 *is* >> supported in these branches. There could be an argument for >> not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds that pre-1.1.1 is >> also supported there. On the whole though, it seems more useful >> today for that test to pass with 3.x than for it to pass with 0.9.8. >> And I can't see investing effort to make it do both (but if Peter >> wants to, I won't stand in the way). > Cutting support for 0.9.8 in oldest branches would be a very risky > move, but as you say, if that only involves a failure in the SSL > tests while still allowing anything we have to work, fine by me to > live with that. Question: is anybody around here still testing with 0.9.8 (or 1.0.x) at all? The systems I had that had that version on them are dead. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Backpatch OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests
- 6133a0f4c7c3 12.15 landed
- cab553a08e2d 11.20 landed
-
OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests
- f0d2c65f17ca 13.0 cited
-
Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
- 7b283d0e1d1d 13.0 cited