Horton

Re: pgsql: Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-01-12T19:21:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> On 11 Jan 2025, at 10:02, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> and the GUC grouping in guc_tables.c/h?

> I don't know what our policy around this is, and maybe the backpatching hazard
> isn't too bad here, but it doesn't entirely seem worth the churn.

I think the entire point of that categorization is to line up with the
docs, so our policy should be to fix this.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Synchronize guc_tables.c categories with vacuum docs categories

  2. Reorder vacuum GUCs in postgresql.conf.sample to match docs

  3. Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection