Re: pgsql: Store 2PC GID in commit/abort WAL recs for logical decoding
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-09T12:30:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- gid-in-wal-records-cleanup.patch (text/x-patch) patch
On 28/03/18 19:47, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Store 2PC GID in commit/abort WAL recs for logical decoding
This forgot to update the comments in xl_xact_commit and xl_xact_abort,
for the new fields.
> +
> + if (parsed->xinfo & XACT_XINFO_HAS_GID)
> + {
> + int gidlen;
> + strcpy(parsed->twophase_gid, data);
> + gidlen = strlen(parsed->twophase_gid) + 1;
> + data += MAXALIGN(gidlen);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (parsed->xinfo & XACT_XINFO_HAS_ORIGIN)
> + {
> + xl_xact_origin xl_origin;
> +
> + /* we're only guaranteed 4 byte alignment, so copy onto stack */
> + memcpy(&xl_origin, data, sizeof(xl_origin));
> +
> + parsed->origin_lsn = xl_origin.origin_lsn;
> + parsed->origin_timestamp = xl_origin.origin_timestamp;
> +
> + data += sizeof(xl_xact_origin);
> }
There seems to be some confusion on the padding here. Firstly, what's
the point of zero-padding the GID length to the next MAXALIGN boundary,
which would be 8 bytes on 64-bit systems, if the start is only
guaranteed 4-byte alignment, per the comment at the memcpy() above.
Secondly, if we're memcpying the fields that follow anyway, why bother
with any alignment padding at all?
I propose the attached.
- Heikki
Commits
-
Fix off-by-one bug in XactLogCommitRecord
- ff03112bdc70 11.0 landed
-
Fix confusion on the padding of GIDs in on commit and abort records.
- cf5a1890592b 11.0 landed
-
Store 2PC GID in commit/abort WAL recs for logical decoding
- 1eb6d6527aae 11.0 cited